Categories
Political Science

What major factors contribute to these different school of thoughts?

Compare and contrast different perspectives about political globalization. What major factors contribute to these different school of thoughts?
Comments from Customer
Discipline: Global Studies

Categories
Political Science

Note: you must cite your sources both in the text of your paper where you use them, and in a works cited page at the end of your paper.

Link to the preposition.
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/qualified-ballot-measures
Note: You must cite your sources BOTH in the text of your paper where you use them, and in a Works Cited page at the end of your paper.

Categories
Political Science

Develop a thesis sentence pertaining to the assigned film text and whether or not it, the film, in your view has the power to transform one’s political sensibilities.

You don’t really have to write an essay more like answer the 4 questions about the film. I’ll tip for having to watch the film.
Comments from Customer
Question 1. Develop a thesis sentence pertaining to the assigned film text and whether or not it, the film, in your view has the power to transform one’s political sensibilities. Your argument should express your point of view regarding the politics of difference, political sensibilities, and political transformation(s) as related to the film. Students must integrate the following Key Terms in their response: Power, Political Sensibilities, and Transformation. No synonyms. Remember, you’re writing (developing) an analytical essay. Submit your thesis statement in the box located to the right. Be sure to proofread your work.
Question 2 Develop three (3) topic sentences that articulate the major ideas that will comprise the body of your essay. Remember that your topic sentences should clearly state the argument or point to be made in the respective paragraphs and must map back to your thesis statement. Submit your topic sentences in the box located to the right. Be sure to proofread your work.
Question 3. Identify three (3) scenes from the film that support your thesis statement. Briefly explain your choices of scenes and how the scenes specifically support your thesis statement. Also, provide the exact time the scenes begin and end within the film text. Submit your reply in the box located to the right. Be sure to proofread your work.
Question 4. Lastly, fully develop your introductory paragraph. Remember that the best possible thesis will answer some specific question about the text. In this case a question related to the film’s power to transform political sensibilities regarding difference. Your thesis sentence should appear parenthetically within the paragraph you present. Submit your answer in the box located to the right. Be sure to proofread your work.

Categories
Political Science

Please note the link to the ted talk is listed in the instructions.

Please see attached instructions and write a 1 page reflection paper. Paper must be 1 page and NOT A SUMMARIZATION of the readings. See attached examples. Please note the link to the TED talk is listed in the instructions.

Categories
Political Science

Make sure to mention all the information that the audience needs to know to understand what the article is about.

Based on the article provided, after reading it, Write a Report about it. Make sure to mention all the information that the audience needs to know to understand what the article is about. Also Give your personal opinion.
ARTICLE :
https://news.yahoo.com/herschel-walker-dems-dividing-americans-121339207.html

Categories
Political Science

Customer is an international student.

Details are in the document. There is a discussion post and also one comment on peer’s post!!
Comments from Customer
Discipline: World Politics
Customer is an international student. Please, provide a regular grammatically correct, well-structured paper according to the instructions and academic context provided, written with simple sentence structures and easy vocabulary (or shortly, use simple English).

Categories
Political Science

I have provided an example memo with the correct numbers that i have calculated, but they want a memo with the same numbers but a different template (own format) that should include few graphs and appropriate reporting of demographics (the numbers i have put on the example memo).

I have provided an example memo with the correct numbers that I have calculated, but they want a memo with the same numbers but a different template (own format) that should include few graphs and appropriate reporting of demographics (the numbers I have put on the example memo). I have attached the example memo, and grading rubric and the assignment notes

Categories
Political Science

Your pro​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​posals to stop a terrorist attack are the heart of your final assignment, this will be the primary criteria for grading this paper and the comprehensive and culminating event for this course.

F​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​inal Assignment Domestic Intel to Stop the Attack
Introduction:
For this final paper you condense two previous papers into a single research paper and then add 3 substantive recommendations on how you propose that domestic intelligence can be employed more effective to support the HSE to stop terrorist attacks. This is essentially what you need to know to write this final paper.
2. Full Spectrum Domestic Intelligence to Counter Terrorism within the Homeland:
Develop a comprehensive 6-8 full page paper summarizing the content and research from your first two papers, and then make at least three substantive recommendations on how to prevent or thwart your selected terrorist group from succeeding in their hypothetical attack on the United States homeland. Do not go over the maximum page number. Points will be deducted for each page over 8 pages.
Use the Organizational Profile (Red Cell paper) you prepared for your Midterm Assignment and combine it with the Progress Assignment you prepared about collecting and analyzing on that group (making all necessary changes based on instructor feedback) and melding them both into one seamless research paper that also adds a major new section to address your specific recommendations to counter your selected terrorist organization’s planned attack in the homeland. Make sure your recommendations are focused only on what happens within the homeland as this is not a foreign policy or international relations course. The recommendations need to be something new or enacting a policy or procedure that is not already in place (do not describe how we already protect the homeland or discuss what current agencies do). Be original or cite ideas from others on how to adapt or reform how intelligence can better support homeland security here domestically to stop your hypothetical attack. Also, make sure your recommendations address a role for state and local agencies (as we discussed in week 4).
The focus of this paper is to address how intelligence, law enforcement and homeland security officials from all three levels of government can prevent or disrupt this attack here in the U.S. (not overseas) by clearly specifying your recommendations of counter-measures to stop or interdict the terrorists here at home before the attack occurs. Employ all that you have learned about intelligence to support Homeland Security and feel free to express your own opinions when making recommendations for Homeland Security intelligence. Just listing what the government already does to collect and analyze and conduct law enforcement on the terrorism threat to the Homeland is not sufficient — make some original or even controversial proposals if you like. Do not discuss defensive or protective measures such as increasing physical security — the thrust of your recommendations needs to be focused on domestic intelligence (that is what this class is about). You can recommend a change to policy, procedure or an organizational change to how the IC (or an individual agency) supports the homeland which directly contributes to stopping a terrorist attack. Feel free to make radical proposals or even changes to existing laws, but do not make proposals that are illegal or unconstitutional (but you can propose changing a law). Remember your hypothetical attack was supposed to be imminent (in the immediate future), so longer term proposals may not be viable for this paper.
Your paper needs to clearly identify your three homeland security intelligence and law enforcement recommendations at the end of your paper before your conclusions, and include specific section headings for each recommendation with the short title for each recommendation. Your pro​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​posals to stop a terrorist attack are the heart of your final assignment, this will be the primary criteria for grading this paper and the comprehensive and culminating event for this course. You must use sections headings like these:
Recommendation 1: Your idea to improve homeland security (domestic) intelligence and law enforcement to specifically stop this impending attack; only what you think should be done at home — DO NOT make overseas recommendations. All three must be homeland intelligence focused proposals and not address anything going on abroad — that is not the subject of this course.
Recommendation 2: Make sure at least one recommendation includes a role for the all-important state and local agencies (week 4).
Recommendation 3: Intelligence is about collecting, analyzing, collaborating, sharing/disseminating, etc, so your recommendations must fall somewhere within the intelligence cycle/process we covered about in week 3. Do NOT make recommendations about increased security measures or ‘force protection’ and defensive approaches — remember this course is about INTELLIGENCE (which is proactive / preventative, not protective / reactive).
Make sure your ideas are original and something you think the government can do better related to intelligence — not status quo or what we are already doing. If you are at a total loss for ideas about how intelligence could stop an attack or be improved with domestic homeland security intelligence, then I suggest looking back over the required reading in week 4 on Fusion Centers for Homeland Security in the section on recommendations on page 24, or consider Challenges and Way Ahead (chapter 12) in the book by Buckley (2014) titled Managing Intelligence: A Guide for Law Enforcement Professionals available as an ebook in our library.
Note on the three paper assignment series: This final assignment combines all that you wrote in the first two papers (they build on each other) for a total of 6-8 FULL pages of content (not including title and reference pages). The final paper is not 6-8 pages of completely new writing since this paper integrates what you wrote for the midterm assignment in week 3 (summarize that first 5-7 page midterm paper with 1-2 pages of content in this final paper), then add information from the progress assignment on collecting and analyzing on them (summarize that second 5-7 page progress paper with 1-2 more pages of content in this final paper as well) — making sure to improve that writing based on my feedback. Then add new information where you are making at least three recommendations (3-4 pages of new material). So, the first 2-4 pages of the final paper will summarize your first two papers, and then the last 3-4 pages or so address your recommendations and summarize the whole paper.
Again, in plain terms, for this final paper, all you have to do is condense your two previous papers (as a research paper) and then make 3 recommendations on how to better stop attacks at the end.
Technical Requirements:
• Your paper must be at a minimum of 6-8 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
• Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content.
• Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.
• Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
• Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
• All submissions will be graded using the att​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ached rubric.

Categories
Political Science

This order is already done and should be under revision.

#​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​82705187
This order is already done and should be under revision. But I would like to pay for that page of​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ ABSTRACT that was not written. It is ok. So please, if it can be given to Mr Scott I will be glad. Thank you​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​.

Categories
Political Science

Y​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ou will conduct an analysis of government actions and leg

Y​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​ou will conduct an analysis of government actions and legal and political responses during the Civil War to the United States. The analysis will center on the precedents from the threat period (law, policy, or case law) and their application to modern homeland security. A focus on the lessons learned from the period to include issues related t​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​o civil liberties is expected.
The paper should provide a short description of the threat, the government responses, impacts to civil liberties from the response, and the lessons for modern homeland security. For threat periods with multiple policy responses and Supreme Court cases it is permissible to focus on one or two issues in depth​‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​.