Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
Hello I have provided all of the sources I was provided with, please let me know if you have any questions
For this discussion, you will read “Supermarket Semantics,” and “You Call That Meat?” and this Purdue OWL page on the Three Appeals (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/establishing_arguments/rhetorical_strategies.html).
Using examples from these texts to support your views, I want you to discuss the relationship between logic, emotion, and ethics in successful arguments.
In particular, I want you to consider the emotional versus logical value of terms like “fresh,” “heart healthy,” “plant based,” “low fat,” “natural,” “real” and so on. Is connotative language like this used to manipulate? Where is the line between a persuasive use of language and information and a dishonest one? Finally, if an argument is successful, does it matter if it is honest or ethical? Why or why not?